Search Results for "Income-tax Act, 1961"

154 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 154 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Cooperative Bank Deduction Case — Commission Income from Cotton Hundi and Electricity Bill Collection Qualifies for Section 80P(2)(a) Deduction. The court held that such activities are integral to banking business and covered by the deduction.

The case involves two appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Nagpur, against the respondent, Amravati District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reopening Case — Reopening Invalid Due to Change of Opinion. Tribunal's finding that reassessment notice was based on mere change of opinion upheld under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case pertains to an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that the reopening of assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, Everest Kanto Cylinder Ltd., a public limited company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 30 November 2015. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Special Audit Order Under Section 142(2A) of Income Tax Act for Lack of Application of Mind. Assessing Officer Failed to Record Satisfaction Regarding Nature and Complexity of Accounts, and Did Not Consider Assessee's Reply, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Hiranandani Foundation, a trust registered under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, runs educational and medical institutions wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 179 Order Against Former Director for Tax Dues of Company — No Evidence of Neglect or Misfeasance. Director Who Resigned Before Relevant Assessment Year Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Default Under Section 179 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Dinesh T. Tailor, was appointed as an Additional director of Yazad Investment & Finance Private Limited on 2 January 1987. He signed a...