Search Results for "Income tax refund"

624 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 624 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Petition Contended That Reopening Was Barred by Limitation and Without Jurisdiction; Court Examined the First Proviso to Section 147 and the Requirement of Full Disclosure.

The petitioner, a company engaged in software development and providing services to foreign clients, challenged the reopening of its assessment for th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition Against Rejection of Section 264 Application for FBT Refund. Intimation under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is an assessment order for the purpose of revision under Section 264.

The petitioner, Hindalco Industries Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 6 March 2019 passed by the Principal Chief Commissioner ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010028192013_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Withholding Tax on Firm Function Services Paid to Non-Resident US Company. Payments for Central Administrative Support Services Held Not Taxable as Fees for Included Services Under Indo-US Tax Treaty.

The petitioner, McKinsey & Company, Inc. (United States), a non-resident company incorporated under US laws, is part of the McKinsey Group providing i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging CBDT's Rejection of Delay Condonation for Filing Revised Income Tax Returns. Non-Speaking Order and Violation of Natural Justice Led to Remand for Fresh Consideration Under Section 119 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, CG Power and Industrial Solutions Ltd., a company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bom...