Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1484 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1484 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Coconut Oil Classification Dispute — Holds Pure Coconut Oil in Small Packings Classifiable as Hair Oil Under Heading 3305. The Court applied Section Note 2 and Chapter Note 3 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, ruling that packaging for retail sale as hair oil overrides classification as edible oil under Heading 1513.

13 Dec 2024

The case involved appeals by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) against M/s. Madhan Agro Industries (India) Private Ltd. concerning the clas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Amendment to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Held Not Retrospective. CESTAT order allowing respondent's appeal upheld as the retrospective amendment by Finance Act, 2010 did not apply to the period prior to its enactment.

24 Aug 2023

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate against Larsen & Toubro Limited (HED) under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Evasion Case — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Settlement Application Without Considering Merits and Without Granting Personal Hearing Set Aside.

24 Feb 2022

The petitioners, Dinesh Bhabootmal Salecha and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Settlemen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Unjust Enrichment. Bar of Unjust Enrichment Not Applicable to Provisional Assessment Cases Prior to Amendment of Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

3 May 2018

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III Commissionerate, against the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Ap...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Excise License Fee Hike — License Fee Enhancement for CL-2, CL-7, and CL-9 Licenses Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Section 17 of Karnataka Excise Act, 1965. Court Held That the Fee Is a Privilege Fee and Not a Tax, and the Government's Policy Decision Is Not Arbitrary.

24 Jun 2014

The petitioners, who are holders of CL-2, CL-7, and CL-9 excise licenses for retail sale of liquor and bars/restaurants in Hubli and Gadag districts, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Steel Products Classified as 'Angles, Shapes and Sections' Under Section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court holds that MRP-based valuation applies only when product is covered by Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and rules thereunder.

27 Sep 2013

The judgment involves three writ appeals filed by M/s Meenakshi Steel Re-rolling Mills and M/s Bhuwalka Steel Industries Limited against the Union of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Circulars Including Dealer's PDI and Free After-Sales Service Costs in Assessable Value of Vehicles — Circulars Held Ultra Vires Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

7 Sep 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Tata Motors Ltd., a manufacturer of vehicles, challenged clause 7 of Circular No. 643/34/2002CX dated 1st July, 2002 and Circular...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty Paid on Exported Goods Under Mistake of Law — Rule 13 Export Bond Not Used. Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law is Recoverable and Limitation Under Section 11B Central Excise Act Does Not Apply to Mistake of Law Claims.

24 Apr 2006

The petitioners, Tata SSL Ltd. and its director, exported consignments of Cold Rolled Sheets and Coils to Nepal by road. The goods were cleared from t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Central Excise Duty Demand Case Due to Absence of Adjudication Order and Show Cause Notice. Demand and Collection of Duty Without Adjudication Order and Show Cause Notice Under Central Excise Act, 1944 Cannot Be Sustained.

26 Apr 2005

The petitioners, National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd. and Mr. N.C. Majumdar, manufacture PVC compounds and PVC Master Batches. Prior to May 1979,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)