Search Results for "Employees' Compensation Act, 1923"

243 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 243 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Insurance Company and Owner in Workmen's Compensation Case. Cleaner's Death in Accident During Employment Held Compensable Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The case involves two appeals under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, filed by the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (Insurance Company) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Insurance Company in Workmen's Compensation Case as Death of Employee While Commuting to Work Did Not Arise Out of Employment. Commuting Accident Lacking Causal Nexus with Employment Is Not Compensable Under Section 3 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The appeal arose from a judgment and award passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation in W.C.A. No. 28 of 2005, awarding compensation to th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Established. Factory Worker's Right Leg Amputated Due to Machine Accident; Compensation of Rs.5,63,795 with 12% Interest Upheld Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The present appeal was filed by original respondent Nos.1 and 2 (Jeev Urja Private Limited and its Executive Director Vasant Kulkarni) challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Appeals by Contractor Challenging Workmen's Compensation Awards. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contractual Arrangement with Principal Employer.

The case involves two first appeals filed by M/s. Krishnagangaa Consultants, a contractor, against the orders of the Commissioner under the Workmen's ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Death of Driver in Course of Employment Entitles Dependents to Compensation. Employer's Failure to Produce Evidence Leads to Adverse Inference Under Section 114(g) of Evidence Act.

The appeal arises from the dismissal of an application for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, by the Commissioner for Workmen's ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Upholds Award for Driver Injured in Auto-Rickshaw Accident. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Lack of Written Contract; Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The case involves an appeal by the United India Insurance Co. Ltd. against an award dated 08.06.2009 passed by the Labour Officer and Commissioner for...