Search Results for "Electricity Department"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Electricity Department"

817 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 817 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Injunction Dispute Over Land Access. High Court sets aside lower courts' orders rejecting temporary injunction, finding that the Plaintiff had established a prima facie case and balance of convenience for restraining Defendants from interfering with its right of way.

23 Jun 2026

The Petitioner, Mondelez India Foods Private Limited (formerly Cadbury India Company Ltd), filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction on Communidade Land in Ribandar-Chimbel Area — Holds That Petitioners Failed to Establish Encroachment on Public Property or Violation of CRZ Norms. The court found that the petitioner society lacked locus standi and the construction permissions were validly granted.

16 Jun 2023

The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Ribandar Chimbel Rakhon Samiti, a registered society, challenging construction ac...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for Regularisation of Service by Casual Worker Against Municipality — No Right to Regularisation After Absorption as Clerk. The appellant, a casual worker since 1991, was absorbed as a clerk in 2000 and granted regular scale; subsequent claim for regularisation from initial engagement was rejected.

1 Jan 2023

The appellant, Om Prakash Banerjee, was appointed as a casual worker by the Municipality (Respondent No. 3) on 18.04.1991 on a daily wage of Rs. 25. H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Applicability of MIR Act to Electricity Company. Held that the Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act, 1946 applies to the electricity industry under Entry 36 of Schedule I, and the petition was grossly delayed.

6 May 2022

The petitioner, Adani Electricity Mumbai Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the orders of reference dated 20th August 2019 passed by the Chief Co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Tariff Dispute Over Change in Law Due to Wildlife Notification. Held that the notification declaring buffer zone around Tadoba Tiger Reserve constituted a 'Change in Law' under PPAs, entitling APML to compensatory tariff for all four PPAs.

27 Aug 2021

The present appeals arise from a dispute between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the appellant, and Adani Power M...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Dispute — Holds That Credit on Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exempted Goods Is Not Permissible Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002. The Court Resolves Conflict Between Earlier Decisions by Distinguishing MODVAT and CENVAT Schemes, Denying Credit for LSHS Used as Fuel in Producing Exempted Fertilizer.

3 Dec 2019

The case involves a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court to resolve an apparent conflict between two decisions: Commissioner of Central Ex...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Probation Period Extended Validly Under Service Rules. Termination of Probationer Without Stigma Upheld as Employer's Discretion Under Regulation 11 of MSETCL Service Regulations.

24 Oct 2016

The petitioners, Chandrashekhar Tukarampant Madankar, Anup Udhav Lokhande, and Harshal Radheshyam Malewar, were appointed as Junior Engineers (Electri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Appeal in Electricity Theft Case — Limitation Period Under Section 127 of Electricity Act, 2003 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended. The court held that an appeal filed after 4 years and 7 months from the assessment order under Section 126 is time-barred, and the appellate authority has no power to condone delay beyond 30 days.

18 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Alka Agrawal, a consumer of the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), was alleged to have committed theft of electricity between...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft and Procedural Irregularities. Theft of Energy Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove Dishonest Abstraction of Energy Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

3 Mar 2011

The appellant, Ramesh s/o Balwant Patil, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 14 of 2005 for theft of elec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Electricity Tariff Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-argue the merits of the case.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to four Civil Review Applications (Nos. 23, 24, 25 and 26 of 2011) filed by industrial consumers against the State of Goa and th...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)