Search Results for "Director resignation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Director resignation"

264 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 264 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Disqualification Provisions in Co-operative Societies Act Against Challenge by Members. Challenge to Section 31(3)(1) and 31(5) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 as ultra vires Article 243-ZJ of Constitution fails.

1 Sep 2017

The petitioners, members of Prathamik Krushi Pattin Sahakar Sangh Niyamit, Deshnur, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes 'C' Summary Report in Cheating Case — Directs Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) CrPC. Court finds that the investigating officer failed to examine crucial documents and witnesses, rendering the summary report premature and based on incomplete investigation.

27 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Dharmil Anil Bodani, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Crim...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Validity of APMC Bye-Laws Requiring Traders to Obtain Licenses and Pay Market Fees — Held that Bye-Laws Framed Under Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 Are Statutory and Binding. Writ petitions challenging bye-laws dismissed as not maintainable without challenging the parent Act.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who are members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, filed writ petitions challenging the validity of certain bye...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Appointment of Administrator for APMC Committee — Appointment of Administrator Without Prior Notice and Without Considering Representation Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that the power under Section 121 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 must be exercised in accordance with natural justice, and failure to issue show cause notice renders the appointment invalid.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who were the President, Vice President, and members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), challenged the ap...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Committee Members Challenging Government Circular Curtailing Term. Section 7(2) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 mandates continuation of committee until newly elected committee assumes office, overriding executive instructions.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, challenged a Government Circular dated 22-04-2016 that purported to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations of Vicarious Liability. Section 141 NI Act requires specific averment that the director was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business at the time of offence.

14 Aug 2015

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was arraigned as accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Director's Application to Quash Process in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations Under Section 141 NI Act. Director Cannot Be Held Vicariously Liable Without Averment of Being in Charge of Business Conduct.

14 Aug 2015

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was arraigned as accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Se...

High Court

High Court Quashes Process Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations of Vicarious Liability. Director Not Involved in Day-to-Day Affairs of Company Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 r/w 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averments of Role and Responsibility.

14 Aug 2015

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Section 138 rea...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Applicant Director Not Involved in Day-to-Day Affairs of Company, No Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 NI Act.

14 Aug 2015

The applicant, Vijay Khairatilal Bhatia, was accused No. 5 in a criminal complaint filed by respondent No. 1, Ashwin Ramesh Mittal, under Section 138 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints for Dishonour of Cheques Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the complainant must prove that the demand notice was sent to the correct address of the accused by registered post with acknowledgment due, failing which the complaint is not maintainable.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves a batch of criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioners (Prabhakar Dattatraya Gune, Sanjay Chandrakant Kirloskar, and M.V. P...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)