High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Disqualification Provisions in Co-operative Societies Act Against Challenge by Members. Challenge to Section 31(3)(1) and 31(5) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 as ultra vires Article 243-ZJ of Constitution fails.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, members of Prathamik Krushi Pattin Sahakar Sangh Niyamit, Deshnur, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of Clause (1) of Sub-section (3) and Sub-section (5) of Section 31 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. They sought a declaration that these provisions are ultra vires Article 243-ZJ of the Constitution. The petitioners contended that Article 243-ZJ provides only specific grounds for disqualification of members of co-operative societies, namely unsoundness of mind, insolvency, conviction for certain offences, and being a defaulter of the society. They argued that the impugned provisions, which disqualify members who have defaulted in repayment of loans, are beyond the scope of Article 243-ZJ and thus unconstitutional. The respondents, including the State of Karnataka and the Co-operative Election Authority, defended the provisions as being within the legislative competence of the State under Article 243-ZJ(2), which allows the Legislature to prescribe additional disqualifications. The court analyzed Article 243-ZJ and noted that it provides a framework but does not exhaustively list all disqualifications. Sub-article (2) of Article 243-ZJ empowers the State Legislature to make provisions for disqualifications. The court held that the impugned provisions are not ultra vires as they are consistent with the object of ensuring financial discipline and proper functioning of co-operative societies. The court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the validity of Section 31(3)(1) and 31(5) of the Act.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Co-operative Societies - Ultra Vires - Article 243-ZJ of the Constitution of India, Section 31(3)(1) and 31(5) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Challenge to provisions enabling disqualification of members for default in loan repayment - Petitioners argued that the provisions are inconsistent with Article 243-ZJ which provides for disqualification only on grounds of unsoundness of mind, insolvency, conviction for certain offences, etc. - Court held that Article 243-ZJ is not exhaustive and the State Legislature has power to prescribe additional disqualifications under Article 243-ZJ(2) - The impugned provisions are within the legislative competence and not ultra vires - Held that the disqualification for default in repayment of loan is a reasonable restriction to ensure financial discipline in co-operative societies (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Clause (1) of Sub-section (3) and Sub-section (5) of Section 31 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 are ultra vires Article 243-ZJ of the Constitution of India?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petitions are dismissed. The impugned provisions are held to be not ultra vires Article 243-ZJ of the Constitution of India.

Law Points

  • Constitutional validity of state legislation
  • Co-operative societies
  • Disqualification of members
  • Ultra vires
  • Article 243-ZJ
  • Section 31 Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1959
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (09) 22

W.P. Nos.108033-108036/2017 (CS-EL/M)

2017-09-01

K. Somashekar

Shivaraj P. Mudhol, K. Vidyavati, Prashant Hosamani, Hemanthkumar L. Havargi

Deepak S/o Virupakshappa Patil, Tammanna S/o Yallappa Manoji, Sadashiv S/o Appanna Kamatagi, Smt. Balavva W/o Bhimshetti Pujeri

State of Karnataka, Karnataka Co-operative Election Authority, Returning Officer, Registrar of Co-operative Society, Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Society, Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Society, Prathamik Krushi Pattin Sahakar Sangh Niyamit, Special Officer, Basavaraj S/o Appanna Bhavikatti, Mallikarjun S/o Bhaveppa Kottal, Kashappa S/o Basavaneppa Kamatagi, Basavaraj S/o Basavaneppa Kedari, Shankar S/o Yamanapa Bajantri, Shekavva W/o Gatigeppa Kamatagi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of provisions of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that Clause (1) of Sub-section (3) and Sub-section (5) of Section 31 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 are ultra vires Article 243-ZJ of the Constitution of India.

Filing Reason

Petitioners, members of a co-operative society, challenged the disqualification provisions for default in loan repayment as being beyond the scope of Article 243-ZJ.

Issues

Whether Clause (1) of Sub-section (3) and Sub-section (5) of Section 31 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 are ultra vires Article 243-ZJ of the Constitution of India?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that Article 243-ZJ provides only specific grounds for disqualification and the impugned provisions are inconsistent with it. Respondents contended that Article 243-ZJ(2) empowers the State Legislature to prescribe additional disqualifications and the provisions are valid.

Ratio Decidendi

Article 243-ZJ of the Constitution of India is not exhaustive and the State Legislature has the power under Article 243-ZJ(2) to prescribe additional disqualifications for members of co-operative societies. The impugned provisions of Section 31(3)(1) and 31(5) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 are within the legislative competence and are not ultra vires.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned provisions are not ultra vires Article 243-ZJ of the Constitution of India. Article 243-ZJ(2) empowers the State Legislature to make provisions for disqualifications.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, challenging the constitutional validity of Section 31(3)(1) and 31(5) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 1st September 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227, Article 243-ZJ
  • Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959: Section 31(3)(1), Section 31(5)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Disqualification Provisions in Co-operative Societies Act Against Challenge by Members. Challenge to Section 31(3)(1) and 31(5) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 as ultra vires Article 243-ZJ of...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Eviction Case Based on Bonafide Need Under C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949 — Reversing Appellate Court's Dismissal of Suit.