Search Results for "Developer's Right"

670 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 670 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cooperative Society Redevelopment Case on Jurisdiction and Limitation Grounds. Civil Court Maintainability Upheld Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and Suit Found Within Limitation with Possible Section 14 Benefit.

The dispute arose from a redevelopment project involving a Cooperative Society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging De-registration of Housing Federation in Ongoing Real Estate Project — RERA Rule 9(1)(ii) Overrides MCS Act for Formation of Apex Body Before Project Completion.

The petitioner, Lodha Belmondo Housing Federation Ltd., a federation registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds MHADA's Order for Repairs and Redevelopment of Cessed Building Under Section 95A of MHADA Act. Court Directs Tenants to Pay Increased Rent and Vacate for Redevelopment, Rejecting Challenge to Executive Engineer's Order.

The appellants, eight tenants of a cessed building in Chittaranjan Nagar, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24 April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.

The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...