Search Results for "Conflicting decrees"

140 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 140 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals on Land Acquisition Compensation for Minor Irrigation Tank. Reference Court's Enhanced Market Value Challenged by Both State and Land Losers.

The High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench heard a conglomeration of appeals filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and cross-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Court Order in Bank Loan Recovery Dispute. Limitation Period for Filing Execution Application Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Is 12 Years, Not 3 Years.

The appeal arises from an order dated 3 November 2004 of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the Appellant's Writ Petition No.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entry in Property Dispute — Petitioners Failed to Establish Title or Possession. Court Held That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and That Civil Suit Is Appropriate Remedy for Title Disputes.

The judgment pertains to a group of writ petitions filed by members of the Shirole family challenging a mutation entry in the revenue records of a pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Passed Judgment in Appeals Filed Under Section 54(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court Considered Challenges by State and Landowners Against Reference Court's Compensation Determination for Lands Acquired for Minor Irrigation Tank.

The case involves multiple appeals and cross-objections filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reject Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata.

The case involves three appeals filed by the defendants (Smt. Malti Kapadia, Hemant Kapadia, and Vijaysingh Kapadia) against an order of the City Civi...