Search Results for "CPC amendment 1976"

456 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Joint Family Property and His Possession.

The appellant, Champa Poojari, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), challenging the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petitions Challenging Maintainability of Appeal Under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC. Court Holds That Appeal Under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC Lies Against Orders Under Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC, Including Those Not Expressly Granting or Refusing Injunction.

The petitioners, Augusto T. D'Souza and Ana D'Souza, filed writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging an order dated 01/12/2012 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of Revisional Order in Execution Proceedings. Decree Against Single Defendant Without Adjudication Held Null and Void Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order VIII Rule 10, Rendering Execution Incompetent.

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the appellants under section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking a permanent injunction aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Dismissal Order in Commercial Suit — Suit Not Barred by Arbitration Clause as Reliefs Are Not Covered by Arbitration Agreement.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants/defendants challenging the order dated 03.02.2023 passed by the Commercial Court at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Order VIII Rule 6A CPC Mandatory for Filing Counterclaim Before Written Statement. Counterclaim Filed After Written Statement Is Not Permissible as Provision Imposes Embargo on Belated Filing.

The Supreme Court of India, in a three-judge bench, addressed a reference regarding the interpretation of Order VIII Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Regular Second Appeal Against First Appellate Order Setting Aside Decree for Name and Caste Correction. First Appellate Court Set Aside Trial Court Decree Holding Suit Not Maintainable, and the High Court Examines Jurisdictional Questions.

The litigation arose when a minor plaintiff, through his father as guardian, filed a suit seeking a declaration that his correct name was 'Aarush' and...