WRIT PETITION NO.19366 OF 2024
9 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "CESTAT order"
317 result(s) found
Found 317 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Case Due to Incorrect Adoption of Highest Price. Valuation Must Be Based on Most Conservative Price Under Rule 6(b)(i) of Central Excise Rules, 1994, as Per Precedents on Normal Wholesale Cash Price.
1 Mar 2023The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal filed by the revenue against an order of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated...
- 179
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cenvat Credit Interest Dispute — Reversal Without Utilization Does Not Attract Interest. Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 interpreted to require actual utilization for interest liability.
25 Mar 2019The appellant, Cipla Limited, a manufacturer of medicaments, was engaged in the manufacture of medicaments containing ethanol (alcohol) which fell out...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Classification Dispute. Construction of Shiv Chatrapati Sports Complex Held Not 'Commercial or Industrial Construction' Under Section 65(25b) of Finance Act, 1994.
15 Mar 2019The Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Pune-III filed an appeal under Section 35G(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order date...
- 119
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. CESTAT's finding that the assessee had reversed CENVAT credit before removal of inputs as waste is a pure finding of fact not open to challenge under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
25 Jul 2018The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribu...
- 39
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. CESTAT's finding that the assessee had reversed CENVAT credit before removal of inputs as waste and scrap was a pure finding of fact not open to challenge under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
25 Jul 2018The Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax) filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the ...
- 30
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal of Commissioner of Customs & Service Tax in Customs Broker Licence Renewal Case — Non-Compliance with Regulation 5 of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 Justifies Rejection of Renewal Application. The Court held that the Commissioner is entitled to seek information under Regulation 5 and the applicant must comply; failure to furnish information sought justifies rejection of the renewal application.
24 Jun 2015The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Service Tax against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against 1% Extra Duty Deposit Despite SVB Order — Circular 11/2001-Cus Mandates Cessation of EDD Upon SVB Decision or Expiry of Four Months. The court held that demanding EDD after SVB order is arbitrary and contrary to the circular and the judgment in M/s. Skoda Auto India Pvt Ltd v. Union of India.
4 Aug 2014The petitioner, E. I. DuPont India Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the action of Respondent No...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against CESTAT Order Upholding Anti-Dumping Duty on Acrylonitrile Butadiene Rubber — Alternative Remedy of Appeal Under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1962 Available. The court held that the existence of an efficacious statutory appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 bars the maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution against an order of the CESTAT under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
16 Jan 2013The petitioners, M/s. Rishiroop Polymers Private Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay Hi...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case — Confiscation of Indian Currency Not Sustainably Linked to Smuggling. CESTAT's finding that Revenue failed to establish necessary ingredients for invoking Section 121 of Customs Act, 1962 upheld.
8 Sep 2010The Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Mumbai filed an appeal against the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) d...
- 36
