High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Filed by Government Department Against Its Employees. The Petitions Relate to Service Conditions at Government Observation Homes.
14 Sep 2017...
Search Results for "Buldana District Order"
196 result(s) found
Found 196 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order in Bombay Police Act Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Measures. Externment Order Set Aside as Authorities Did Not Consider Whether Petitioner Could Be Dealt With Under Other Provisions of Law Before Resorting to Section 56(1)(a)(b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951.
10 Aug 2010The petitioner, Sandip Devidas Thorat, a resident of Kopargaon, Ahmednagar, was issued a show cause notice dated 15th April 2009 by the Sub-Divisional...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Co-operative Society Challenging Auction Sale of Properties for Recovery of Dues Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Sale Confirmed Despite Allegations of Non-Attachment and Improper Upset Price as No Prejudice Shown.
22 Dec 2005The appellant, Shegaon Taluka Co-operative Agricultural Purchase and Sale Society Limited, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment of a Sin...
- 54
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of States Reorganisation Act, 1956: Formation of Composite Bombay State Without Fresh Reference to State Legislature Upheld. Modification of Bill by Parliament Does Not Require Second Reference Under Proviso to Article 3 of the Constitution of India.
28 Aug 1959The case arose from a challenge to the constitutional validity of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956. Following the report of the States Reorganisati...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Restoration of Possession to Judgment-Debtor — Decree Holder Cannot Take Possession Without Execution Proceedings. The appellate court's inherent power under Section 151 CPC to restore possession was upheld as the decree holder's self-help dispossession was illegal.
28 Nov 2025The petitioner, Amol Subashrao Deshpande, was the original plaintiff who filed a suit for declaration, removal of encroachment, possession, and injunc...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Appointments in Service Matter — Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners' Appointments Cancelled Based on Tribunal Order Without Giving Them Hearing, Held Illegal.
26 Jun 2013The petitioners, Jyoti Ashokrao Dhabadge and Jaishree Harihar Raut, applied for and were selected for posts pursuant to an advertisement issued by the...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entries in Revenue Records — Revenue Entries Do Not Confer Title, Civil Suit Is Proper Remedy.
30 Nov -0001The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer ...
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Immediate Compensation to Complainant for Lost Muddemal Property - State Must Pay First, Recover from Erring Officials Later. The court held that the complainant cannot be made to wait for recovery from delinquent employees, and the State must pay compensation for lost seized property under Section 379 IPC.
11 Feb 2015The petitioner, Vijay Dashrath Pandagale, filed a criminal writ petition seeking implementation of an order dated 12.02.2013 passed by the Judicial Ma...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Minority Institution to Fill Vacant Teaching Posts Without Prior Approval Under MEPS Act. Held that minority institutions are exempt from prior approval requirement under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 for filling vacancies.
26 Oct 2023The petitioners, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Samaj Sudharak Mandal (a registered society and public trust) and its educational institutions, along with ind...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Restoration of Possession to Judgment-Debtor in Execution Dispute. Decree Holder Cannot Take Possession Without Execution Proceedings Under Order 21 CPC; Appellate Court Has Inherent Power Under Section 151 CPC to Restore Status Quo Ante.
28 Nov 2025The petitioner, Amol Subashrao Deshpande, was the original plaintiff who filed a suit for declaration, removal of encroachment, possession, and injunc...
- 212
