Search Results for "Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950"

358 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 358 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trust Dispute Over Alleged Forged Documents and Election Irregularities Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. The court set aside the District Judge's order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of the change report.

The present appeal was filed by the original respondent Nos.1 to 6 challenging the Judgment and order dated 07.04.2017 passed by the learned District ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Contribution Order for Non-Application of Mind in Maharashtra Public Trust Act Case — State Failed to Consider Mandatory Factors Under Section 58(4) While Fixing 2% Rate.

The petitioner, Dadimay Medical Memorial Research Trust, a public trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950, challenged an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Trust Property Suit. Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Was Not Barred by Law.

The petitioner, a defendant in a suit filed by the first respondent (a public trust), challenged the order dated 12.03.2015 passed by the II Additiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Against Scheme Framed for Public Trust Under Section 50A of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. No Substantial Question of Law Found in Concurrent Findings of Fact.

The appellant, Anil Govindrao Shirkhedkar, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Refusal of Permission for Sale of Trust Property Under Section 36 of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. The Court Held That the Charity Commissioner's Refusal Was Justified as the Trust Failed to Show Urgent Necessity or Benefit to the Trust.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a common order dated 19.4.2005 passed by the Charity Commissioner, Pune, refusing permission unde...