Search Results for "Belated Application"

1416 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1416 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Belated Production of Power of Attorney in Civil Suit. Foundational Pleadings Not Required at Production Stage; Trial Court's Discretion Upheld with Costs.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original deceased defendant no.1 in Special Civil Suit No.222/2009, challenged the trial court's order dated 29.07...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Tenancy Case Due to 33-Year Delay and Land Conversion -- Proceedings Under Bombay Tenancy Act Barred When Land Converted to Non-Agricultural Use

The petitioners challenged show cause notices issued under Section 84C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding land transactio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Order Allowing Amendment of Plaint in Partition Suit. Amendment Sought After Trial Was Almost Over, Held Unnecessary and Belated Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The appeal arose from a partition suit filed by respondent No.1 (plaintiff) in the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, in 1990. The plaintiff sought amendmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Order for Handwriting Expert in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Foundation in Cross-Examination. Accused's Application Under Section 482 CrPC Allowed as Trial Court's Order Was Without Basis.

The applicant, Simratmal Hiralal Gandhi, was the original accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed by r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...