Search Results for "Article 31A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Article 31A"

90 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 90 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Tenancy Purchase Dispute — Filing of Section 32G Proceedings Constitutes Sufficient Intimation Under Section 32F of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Tenant's Right to Purchase Land Not Defeated by Delay Where Landlord Failed to Inform Tenant of Attaining Majority.

18 Feb 2025

The case involves a dispute over agricultural land in Village Devarashtra, Taluka Khanapur, District Sangli, owned originally by Shankar Govind Kurlek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition in Land Possession Dispute Under Section 33B of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Landlords' Certificate of Exemption Under Section 88C Upheld, Personal Cultivation Need Established.

8 Jun 2023

The case involves a dispute between the petitioners, who are the heirs of the original tenant Kondiba Dnyanu Dongale, and the respondents, who are the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Street Scheme Due to Delay and Laches. Acquisition Proceedings Initiated in 1969 and Completed in 1986 Cannot Be Challenged After 14 Years Without Justification.

11 Aug 2017

The dispute relates to the acquisition of land bearing field Survey Nos.147/2, 153, 154/1, 2 and 3, 155, 156 and 156/1, admeasuring about 10.10 acres,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors and Borrowers. Court Holds That Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act Provides an Alternative Remedy to Challenge Possession Notices and That Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Should Not Be Entertained When Statutory Remedy Is Available.

5 Jul 2016

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11th September 2015 passed by the Chief Metr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Prior to Notification Does Not Bar Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that interest under Section 28 is payable from the date of taking possession, even if possession precedes the Section 4(1) notification.

18 Apr 2016

The case arises from a land acquisition matter where the State of Maharashtra appealed against the Reference Court's award of interest on enhanced com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Prior to Notification Does Not Bar Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that interest under Section 28 is payable from the date of taking possession, regardless of whether possession precedes the Section 4(1) notification.

18 Apr 2016

The case arises from a land acquisition proceeding where the State of Maharashtra appealed against the Reference Court's award of interest on enhanced...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Superannuation at 60 Years — Upholds Government's Refusal to Extend Service Age Based on Confidential Report Grades. Court holds that clause 11(4) of Government Resolution dated 05.03.2011 requiring minimum three 'A' and two 'B+' grades in preceding five years is mandatory and not arbitrary.

29 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Reeta Harode, a government employee, reached the age of 60 years on 31.10.2013. She sought extension of her superannuation age up ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Municipal Councillor for Defying Party Whip Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1986. The Court held that the Petitioner's act of voting against the party whip constituted defiance, warranting disqualification under Section 3(1)(b) of the Act.

18 Jul 2014

The Petitioner, Mrs. Sulabha Vijay Lokhande, was a Municipal Councillor in Panchgani Municipal Council, elected as an independent candidate in Decembe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor in Appeal Reheard After Supreme Court Remand. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Medical Evidence Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 364, 376(2)(f), 302, 201 IPC and Section 57 of Bombay Children Act, 1948.

30 Jul 2013

The appellant, Armogam Munnaswami Kounder, was convicted by the trial court on 19th April 2000 for offences under Sections 364, 376(2)(f), 302, and 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Non-Tribal Transferees in Land Restoration Case — Non-Obstante Clause in Special Act Prevails Over General Revenue Code. The Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 overrides Section 36 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and principles of res judicata do not bar suo motu proceedings under Section 3 of the Special Act.

17 Jul 2012

The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by non-tribal transferees (appellants) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High C...

6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)