Search Results for "Ancillary powers"

791 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 791 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Order Under Hyderabad Atiyat Inquiries Act, 1952; Final Decision Not Provided in Extracted Text. Petitioners Challenge Declaration of Mutawalli and Succession Rights for Hazarat Sayed Chand Dargah and Masjid, Udgir, and Possession of Survey Nos. 167 and 230.

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad heard a group of four writ petitions (Writ Petition Nos. 3735 of 2014, 6172 of 2014, 4957 of 2014, and 4047 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification in Tender for Pumping Machinery at MIDC Water Treatment Plant. Court holds that disqualification based on alleged non-submission of required documents was arbitrary and contrary to tender conditions.

The petitioner, M/s Yogiraj Powertech Pvt. Ltd., participated in a tender process issued by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...