Search Results for "Action Ispat case"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Action Ispat case"

173 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows JSW Steel's Challenge to Electricity Duty Demand on Captive Consumption. Held that electricity generated from captive power plant and consumed for own use is not 'sold' and thus not exigible to electricity duty under the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958.

2 Apr 2026

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, a company engaged in steel manufacturing, operates a captive power plant (CPP) at its factory in Raigad, Mahar...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitions Challenging Environmental Clearance Condition for Iron Ore Handling at Mormugao Port. Condition requiring prior environmental clearance for handling of iron ore at berths is valid under Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 and Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

14 Sep 2023

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by companies and shareholders involved in iron ore handling at Mormugao Port, Goa, challenging a cond...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitions Challenging Environmental Clearance Conditions for Iron Ore Handling at Mormugao Port. Court upholds requirement of prior environmental clearance for storage and handling of iron ore at port premises under the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006.

14 Sep 2023

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by companies involved in iron ore handling at Mormugao Port, Goa, challenging the requirement of p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Coal Mine Development and Production Agreement for Non-Submission of Bank Guarantee Extension. Termination Without Prior Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Held Arbitrary and Violative of Natural Justice Under Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015.

10 Feb 2023

The petitioner, B. S. Ispat Limited, a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, emerged as the successful bidder in a tender...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Arbitral Award on Repairs and Interest. The court upheld the Single Judge's order setting aside findings on repairs as perverse and reduced interest rate from 18% to 9% per annum.

18 Aug 2022

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Interocean Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd against an order of the le...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Retrospective Enhancement of Retirement Age in Service Regulations Case. High Court Exceeded Judicial Review Limits by Ordering Retrospective Effect from 2002 for Age Enhancement Under UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 and NOIDA Regulations, 1981.

15 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from the enhancement of the retirement age for employees of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) from 58 to 60 yea...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Transfer of Winding Up Petition to NCLT Despite Admission Order. Discretion Under Section 434(1)(c) Companies Act, 2013 Properly Exercised Where Liquidation Was at Initial Stage and No Irreversible Steps Taken.

14 Dec 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Action Ispat and Power Pvt. Ltd. against the Delhi High Court's order transferring a winding up petition to the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 8 Application and Refuses Summary Judgment in Commercial Suit for Recovery of Rs. 54.46 Crores. The court held that the existence of an arbitration agreement in the overarching Logistics Agreement and Product Purchase Agreement mandates reference to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, barring the court from passing a decree in the summary suit.

12 Mar 2018

The plaintiff, Drive India Enterprise Solutions Ltd., filed a summary suit against the defendant, Haier Telecom (India) Pvt. Ltd., seeking a money dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Time-Barred Counterclaim in Arbitration. Limitation for Counterclaim Runs from Date of Termination of Contract, Not from Subsequent Correspondence.

16 Aug 2013

The appeal arose from an order dated 1 October 2012 passed by a learned Single Judge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Predeposit Order in Central Excise Case — Prima Facie Case for Waiver Established. The court held that the Tribunal's direction to deposit Rs. 11.52 lakhs under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was unsustainable as the appellant had made out a strong prima facie case on the issue of suppression of facts and limitation.

26 Jul 2011

The appellant, Vinar Ispat Limited, was engaged in converting billets, blooms, and slabs purchased from various manufacturers on a job work basis into...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)