Search Results for "APMC Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "APMC Rules"

122 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 122 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes APMC Resolution Cancelling Licence for Non-Payment of Market Fee — Market Committee Cannot Revoke Licence Without Following Section 47 Procedure. The Court held that cancellation of licence without notice and hearing is illegal and without jurisdiction under Section 47 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1996.

8 Sep 2025

The petitioners, Sunil Agro Foods Limited and Venugopal Flour Mills, were traders holding licences issued by the Agricultural Produce Marketing Commit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Civil Court Order in Trust Dispute — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejection of Application to Reopen Evidence Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC. The court held that the Civil Court's discretionary order rejecting the application to recall witnesses after the case was reserved for judgment did not warrant interference under Article 227.

25 Jun 2025

The petitioners, who are defendants in a civil suit pending before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Mandya, filed writ petitions under Article 227 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Is Mandatory and Unjust Enrichment Applies to Pre-deposit Refunds. The court held that the one-year limitation for refund claims cannot be extended and the claimant must prove no passing of duty burden.

8 Mar 2024

The case involves two connected matters: an appeal by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Thane Rural, against an order of the Customs, Excise ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention of Goods Under GST for Lack of Jurisdiction — Second Detention Without Proper Authorization Invalid. The court held that detention of goods under Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017 requires proper authorization and cannot be done without jurisdiction.

19 Aug 2020

The petitioner, a transporter registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Rejecting Application Under Section 151 CPC for Reopening of Evidence — Trial Court Failed to Exercise Jurisdiction Under Article 227. The court held that inherent powers under Section 151 CPC can be invoked to reopen evidence to secure ends of justice, and the trial court's refusal to allow the plaintiff to be examined in person was a failure to exercise jurisdiction.

31 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Smt. Jabeena Hussaini, represented by her power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Execution Proceedings, Setting Aside Dismissal as Time-Barred. The court held that filing chamber summons and other applications constituted steps in aid of execution, extending limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

18 Oct 2016

The case involves an appeal by Pratap G. Somaiya (the appellant/decree-holder) against an order dismissing his execution application as time-barred. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order of Secretary of Agriculture Produce Market Committee. Transfer Order Set Aside as Violative of Section 44(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and Principles of Natural Justice.

1 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Deorao S/o Bhujangrao Fuke, was serving as the Secretary of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Majalgaon, District Beed....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Copra as Not Notified Agricultural Produce Under APMC Act. Explanation to Rule 32(1) of Goa APMC Rules Held Ultra Vires as Copra Not in Schedule to Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

22 Jul 2016

The petitioners, Marico Industries Ltd. and Jude Linhares, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the demand for market...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Chairman of APMC Katol for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. Notice Issued on 02.12.2013 for Meeting on 12.12.2013 Held Invalid as It Did Not Provide 15 Clear Days' Notice as Required by Rule 14(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967.

12 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Katol, challenged a notice dated 02.12.2013 issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination for APMC Election Due to Disqualification Under Section 16 of M.S. Act, 1960. Respondent No. 4 was disqualified as a defaulter of a cooperative society, yet nomination was improperly accepted.

18 Jun 2010

The petitioners, Dinkar Uttamrao Patil and Pundlik Raoji Pawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)