Search Results for "substantive offence"

2204 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2204 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Search of Bag Without Informing Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate

The appellant, Jude Okonkwo Chukwuemeka, a Nigerian national, was convicted by the trial court for an offence under Section 8(c) read with Section 21(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 2011

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Shailendrakumar Satyanarayan Thakur, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, on 25th October 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Laxman alias Laxmayya Gangaram Zinna, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai for the offence punishable under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Under Section 364-A IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Identification of Victim and Accused.

The case involves three appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) against their conviction and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments. Directors Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Allegations of Their Role in Company's Day-to-Day Affairs.

The petitioners, who were directors of the accused company, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Se...