Search Results for "section 326"

1093 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1093 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Examine Defence Witnesses in Sessions Case — Right to Fair Trial Under Article 21 Includes Opportunity to Lead Defence Evidence. Rejection of Summons for Defence Witnesses Set Aside as Violative of Natural Justice and Section 243 CrPC.

The petitioners, original accused in Sessions Case No. 11/2001 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, were facing trial under Sections ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Injunction Granted Against Alienation of Property. Development Agreement for Cessed Building Confers Prima Facie Rights; Balance of Convenience Favors Developer.

The appeal arises from an order of a learned Single Judge declining relief in a Notice of Motion taken out by the appellants in a suit for specific pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cross-Cases of Land Dispute Violence — Benefit of Doubt Given Due to Inconsistent and Interested Testimony. Conviction under Sections 326, 324, 323, 504, 114 IPC and Section 3(1)(10) SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of the respondents-accused in two interconnected cross-cases arising from a land dispute. The inci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal for Impleadment in Winding Up Proceedings Due to Lack of Shareholding and Delay. Appellant, who sold his shares and ceased to be a shareholder, cannot seek impleadment in company winding up proceedings under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appellant, Dr. Kirtivan D. Kotian, along with his family members, originally held over 95% shares of M/s S. Manikya Plastichem Private Limited and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 305 IPC for Abetment of Suicide of a Minor — No Mens Rea or Instigation Established. Accused's Allegation of Theft of Rs.50 by Deceased Child Does Not Constitute Abetment to Commit Suicide Under Section 305 IPC.

The applicant, Sarla Ratnakar Dhumal, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR ...