Search Results for "property identification"

1083 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1083 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Property Tax Reassessment Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 — Reassessment Based on Capital Value Method Upheld as Valid Exercise of Statutory Power.

The petitioner, Satguru Corporate Services Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging the reassessment of property tax by the Additional Collecto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender for Textile Mill Land Sale. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any legal right to compel conclusion of sale after tender was cancelled due to non-compliance with terms.

The petitioner, M/s Drushti Engineers & Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Investigation into MLA's Assets for Lack of Credible Material. Court holds that mere allegations of disproportionate assets without prima facie evidence cannot justify investigation under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Sanjay Dinanath Tiwari, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court seeking investigation into the financial affairs o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Specific Performance Suit — Appellants Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Despite Service of Summons.

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of a contract filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the appellants/defendants. The trial cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Amendment Seeking Declaration of Co-Ownership Barred by Limitation. The amendment sought to introduce a new case of co-ownership after the expiry of limitation period under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the original Defendant No.4 against the judgment of the Appellate Court which allowed an amendment to the p...