Search Results for "possession and enjoyment"

1337 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1337 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Property Declaration Suit — Upholds Trial Court Decree Based on Adverse Possession and Valid Title. Concurrent findings of fact regarding possession and title cannot be disturbed in appeal without substantial error.

The case involves two Regular First Appeals (RFA No.429/2003 and RFA No.506/2003) filed against the judgment and decree dated 13.1.2003 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Marriage and Consequential Rights Over Suit Property; Courts Below Correctly Appreciated Evidence.

The appellant, Basangouda, filed a suit for declaration and injunction in O.S. No. 20/2006 before the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Raichur, claim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 2973 OF 2025

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Writ Petitions in Eviction Case Based on Bona Fide Need. Appellate Court's reversal of eviction decrees set aside for ignoring settled legal principles regarding landlord's bona fide need under Section 13(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioner, Nilkanthrao Raghunathji Chute, is the landlord of a building known as 'Sai Sadan' in Nagpur, which contains four shops on the ground f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Assignment Dispute — Plaintiff's Title Upheld Based on Valid Government Assignment and Possession. The court restored the trial court's decree of injunction, finding that the lower appellate court's reversal was perverse and not supported by evidence.

The plaintiff, an ex-serviceman, applied for assignment of a poramboke land in 1985. The Collector directed payment, which was made on 16/10/1985. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellants Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act Upheld as Appellants Were Not Owners and Compensation Was Already Paid to Recorded Owner.

The appellants, Sri K. Srinivas Murthy and Smt S.V. Padma, filed a writ appeal against the order of a Single Judge dismissing their writ petition chal...