Search Results for "eviction grounds"

1055 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1055 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Application in Second Appeal for Failure to Frame Substantial Question of Law — Error Not Apparent on Record. Non-formulation of substantial question of law under Section 100(4) CPC is a procedural irregularity correctable in appeal, not review under Section 114 CPC.

The applicants, Park View Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. and Vinayak Narayan Ghatate, were the respondents in Second Appeal No.110/2011 before the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging SRA Scheme for Lack of Public Interest. Court finds that the petition is not a genuine public interest litigation but is filed to further personal interests of the petitioner.

The petitioner, claiming to be the President of Mumbai Division of Maharashtra Machhimar Kruti Samiti, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Landlord’s Appeal in Bihar Tenancy Dispute; Thika Patta Held to be Lease, Not Mortgage. Tenants of a Tenure-Holder, Being Settled Raiyats Under Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885, Acquired Occupancy Rights and Could Not Be Evicted After Expiry of Head Lease.

The dispute arose from a thika patta executed by the predecessor-in-interest of the plaintiff (appellant) in favor of B, covering a village for a term...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Assignee Bank Can Invoke SARFAESI Act for Debt Assigned by NBFC. The case involves interpretation of 'debt' and 'secured creditor' under SARFAESI Act, 2002 and RDDBFI Act, 1993, and the effect of assignment from a non-banking financial company to a bank.

The petitioner, a banking company, sought to enforce security interest under the SARFAESI Act after acquiring a debt and underlying security from a no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders of Tahsildar and Deputy Collector; Remands Tenancy Possession Dispute for Fresh Consideration. Tahsildar Lacked Jurisdiction Under Section 98A of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950.

The dispute centred on possession of tenancy land protected under the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The original owner was Madan...