WRIT PETITION NO. 1562 2004 AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "civil dispute versus criminal"
2410 result(s) found
Found 2410 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Cancellation of Gift Deed Under Senior Citizens Act for Non-Maintenance — Tribunal Has Jurisdiction to Declare Transfer Void Under Section 23. The court held that failure to provide basic amenities to a senior citizen renders the transfer deemed as made by fraud or coercion, and the Tribunal can cancel the deed without requiring a civil suit.
29 Aug 2024The petitioners, Nandkishor Shivdin Sahu (son-in-law) and Urga Nandkishor Sahu (daughter), challenged the order of the Maintenance Tribunal under the ...
- 1084
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, hears appeals challenging conviction for murder and related offences. Accused were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code for causing death by unlawful assembly, while the victim appealed for enhancement of sentence and additional convictions.
16 Jul 2015This judgment arises from three connected criminal appeals before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the judgmen...
- 22
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit, Sets Aside Dismissal for Non-Prosecution. The Court restored Civil Suit No. 2037 of 1998 to the file of the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, holding that the dismissal for default was not justified given the long pendency of the suit.
12 Feb 2026The appellant, Abhishek Finlease Ltd., filed a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree...
- 90
High Court
Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Landlord-Tenant Dispute, Acquits Co-Accused for Lack of Evidence. Common intention not established for all accused; conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed for main accused based on eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.
13 Jan 2026The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute over a shop premises in Ahmedabad. The complainant, Devendrakumar Shankarlal Oswal, was a tenant of Man...
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award in Shareholder Dispute. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.
13 Mar 2013The case involves two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by M/s. Goldstar Metal Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and M/s...
- 130
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Against Complainant's Husband Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. The court held that the husband of the complainant cannot be prosecuted for dishonour of cheques issued by the wife in discharge of her own liability, as there is no vicarious liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
13 Oct 2017The applicant, A.C. Narayanan, was impleaded as an accused in complaints filed by respondent no.2 for offences punishable under Section 138 of the Neg...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.
31 Aug 2012The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...
- 145
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Based on Oral Agreement and Part Performance. The court upheld the decree for specific performance of an oral agreement for sale of a suit block, finding that the plaintiff had proved readiness and willingness and the suit was within limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
20 Apr 2023The case involves a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement for sale of a suit block admeasuring 110 square feet. The plaintiff, Sudhir Gul...
- 11
High Court
Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.
21 Jan 2026The appellant, Yadav Rajbahadur Ghyansingh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Mehsana, for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(...
- 130
