Search Results for "arbitrary restriction"

932 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 932 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Cess Increase Under Zilla Parishad Act. Levy of Cess and Additional Cess on Agricultural Land Upheld as Valid Under Sections 144 and 155 of the Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Act, 1961.

The petitioners, residents and owners of agricultural lands in Ahmednagar District, challenged the Resolution dated 06/11/1993 passed by respondent No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Removal from LPG Distributorship Panel - Site Location Dispute Resolved in Favor of Petitioner. The court held that the term 'Mouda' in the advertisement includes the Gram Panchayat area, and removal without hearing violates natural justice.

The petitioner, Mukesh Tiwari, applied for an LPG distributorship in Mouda pursuant to an advertisement by Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CIDCO's Refusal to Grant Lease in Favour of Air India Employees' Cooperative Housing Society. Transfer of Land Allotted to Air India for Staff Quarters Requires Prior Permission of CIDCO Under New Bombay Disposal of Lands Regulations 1975.

The petitioners, a cooperative housing society formed by employees of Air India, sought a writ of mandamus directing CIDCO to grant a lease in their f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Upholds Award as Not Suffering from Patent Illegality or Being Against Public Policy, Refusing to Reappreciate Evidence.

The petitioner, Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 May 2009 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...