Search Results for "Section 326"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Section 326"

1084 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1084 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Employees' State Insurance Act Case Due to Insufficient Evidence on Principal Employer Role and Non-Deposit of Contributions. Conviction under Section 85(i)(b) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Accused Deducted and Failed to Deposit ESI Contributions from Employees' Wages.

17 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a criminal conviction under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The appellant, along with the company, was accused of fail...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 305 IPC for Abetment of Suicide of a Minor — No Mens Rea or Instigation Established. Accused's Allegation of Theft of Rs.50 by Deceased Child Does Not Constitute Abetment to Commit Suicide Under Section 305 IPC.

7 Sep 2022

The applicant, Sarla Ratnakar Dhumal, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Against Settlement Commission in Anti-Dumping Duty Case; Sets Aside Adjustment of Time-Barred Demand and Imposition of Penalty on Partner. Settlement Commission Cannot Allow Recovery of Duty Beyond Five-Year Limitation Period Under Section 28(4) of Customs Act, 1962, and Penalty on Partner Requires Specific Show Cause Notice.

4 Aug 2017

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in importing solvents and chemicals, challenged an order of the Settlement Commission, Customs and Central ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Against Money Lender Under Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007, Holding That Alleged Acts Constituted Law and Order Issue, Not Public Order. Detention Order Lacked Reasons and No Attempt to Cancel Bail, Hence Violative of Article 21.

26 Jul 2026

The matter arose from a preventive detention order passed against Rajesh, a money lender running ‘Rithika Finance’, by the District Magistrate, Pa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remits Bail Challenge to High Court for Fresh Consideration — Distinction Between Cancellation of Bail and Challenge to Arbitrary Exercise of Discretion Clarified. The Court held that the High Court erred in treating the appellant's application as one for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) CrPC instead of a challenge to the arbitrary exercise of discretion in granting bail under Section 439 CrPC, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

30 Jul 2019

The appellant, Bharatbhai Bhimabhai Bharwad, filed criminal appeals against orders of the Gujarat High Court that declined to interfere with the trial...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Failure to Consider Less Drastic Remedies. Detenu's bail in all three predicate offences and lack of credible material to show disturbance of public order vitiated the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority.

9 Apr 2020

The petitioner, Mukesh @ Mukya Ramesh Desaikar, challenged a preventive detention order dated 31st October 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rioting and Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 326, 504, 506 of IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

19 Oct 2010

The case involves an appeal against conviction in Sessions Trial No. 544 of 1998. The appellants, Bhaurao Dangarkar and three others, were convicted f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Material Contradictions and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302 and 324 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

9 Mar 2012

The case pertains to an incident on 11.10.1997 at about 10.30 a.m. when Imtiyazkhan and Fayazkhan went to their field for sowing. Yahyakhan noticed ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Bombay Police Act for Lack of Material to Show Petitioner as a Dangerous Person. The court held that mere registration of criminal cases and in-camera statements without evidence of public harm cannot sustain an externment order under Section 56(a)(b) of the Bombay Police Act, 1951.

20 Jun 2005

The petitioner, Naresh Hiralal Rathod, challenged an externment order passed under Section 56(a)(b) of the Bombay Police Act, 1951, by the Deputy Comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Committal Order in Counter Case Dispute — Offences Not Exclusively Triable by Sessions Court Cannot Be Committed Without Trial Commencement. The Court held that Section 323 CrPC requires commencement of inquiry or trial before committal, and two cases with different times, places, and accused are not part of same transaction for joint trial.

26 Feb 2016

The petitioner, Karan Sunil Ingole, challenged the order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.4, Baramati, committing RCC No.247 of 2011 t...

77 78 79 80 81

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)