Search Results for "Rule 137"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Rule 137"

1189 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1189 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Charity Commissioner's Order in Trust Dispute — Upholds Rejection of Application for Leave to Sue Under Section 51 of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. The court held that the Charity Commissioner's discretion under Section 51 is quasi-judicial and not to be interfered with lightly, and that without prior leave, a suit against a public trust is not maintainable.

5 Apr 2023

The petitioners, Shri Bhagwan Pandurang Khedekar and Shri Purshotam Balkrushna Kondhare, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Enforcement of RERA Order and Grants Interim Relief of Deposit and Injunction Against Developer. RERA Order Directing Refund of Investment with Interest Must Be Complied With by Revenue Authorities and Developer.

15 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Rustam Phiroze Mehta, filed a writ petition seeking enforcement of an order dated 15th April 2019 passed by the Maharashtra Real Estat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

2 Jul 2020

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners challenging mutation entries made in the revenue records in favor of the origin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Licensee's Challenge to Arrears Demand and License Lapse in Bombay Prohibition Act Case. Demand for License Fee Arrears for Period Prior to License Grant Held Unenforceable and License Cannot Lapse Without Notice.

13 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Suresh Krishnaji Lakudkar, held a CLIII license under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, for the sale of foreign liquor. In Writ Petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of M/s. Venkatesh Trading Company Against Minister's Order Setting Aside Tender Award in Sugar Transportation Contract. Minister's Order Quashed as Arbitrary and Without Justification, Contract Award to Sole Qualified Bidder Upheld.

29 Oct 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Venkatesh Trading Company, challenged the order of the Minister of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection dated 16/8/2010, ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Company Law Board Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Case — Upholds CLB's Discretion to Grant Interim Relief Under Section 402 of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the CLB has wide powers to pass interim orders to prevent oppression and mismanagement, and such orders are not final determinations of rights.

13 Aug 2013

The Union of India, through the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, filed an appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, against an interim order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Orders Return of Security in Admiralty Suit for Lack of Sister Ship Relationship. Security furnished for arbitration claim cannot be retained when the vessel arrested is not a sister ship of the vessel for which services were provided.

21 Feb 2014

The plaintiff, Condor Maritime Dienstleistung GmbH & Co. KG, filed an admiralty suit against m.v. Western Light and its owners (defendants) claiming m...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petitions Against Common Order Upholding Land Acquisition for Inner Ring Road Project — No Error Apparent on Record Found. The court held that review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited and the applicants failed to demonstrate any manifest error in the original order dismissing writ petitions on the ground of alternative remedy under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

9 Jan 2026

The judgment pertains to a batch of review applications filed against a common order dated 27.04.2023 passed by the Madras High Court in W.P.No.7735 o...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Interim Injunction Applications in Commercial Suit for Trademark Infringement and Passing Off. Applications Seek to Restrain Defendants from Using 'ORBIT' Mark Pending Suit Disposal.

24 Feb 2025

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Appeals Against Single Judge Order Dated 28-02-2018 Dismissing Writs Filed by Gram Panchayat Office-Bearers. Appeals Under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act Question Correctness of Single Judge’s Refusal to Grant Relief in Panchayat Leadership Disputes.

12 Oct 2018

This batch of writ appeals was filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 before a Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at B...

77 78 79 80 81

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)