Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority"

1049 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1049 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging District Deputy Registrar's Order in Cooperative Society Dispute — Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Registrar's Order Quashed as It Was Passed Without Hearing the Petitioner Society and Without Considering Its Objections Under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

10 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Garodia Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., through its Honorary Secretary, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 15th June,...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition by Cooperative Society Against Ministerial Order Halting Inquiry Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act - Restores Statutory Inquiry into Financial Irregularities by Former Directors

24 Feb 2026

The High Court allowed a writ petition filed by Petitioner challenging an order passed by the Minister for Cooperation that halted a statutory inquiry...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice Under Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Building Declared Dangerous and in Ruinous Condition. Court Held That Occupants Cannot Resist Demolition of Unsafe Building on Grounds of Pending Redevelopment or Ownership Claims.

22 Aug 2019

The petitioners, three occupants of a building called New Kisant Cooperative Housing Society in Mazgaon, Mumbai, challenged a notice dated 3rd July 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order of MHADA Employee — Transfer Held to Be Administrative Decision Not Subject to Strict Judicial Review Unless Mala Fide or Violative of Statutory Rules.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Balkrishna Dattatraya Joshi, was an employee of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) working at Dhule. He wa...

High Court

Deemed Conveyance under MOFA – Rejection of Application by Competent Authority Set Aside. High Court of Bombay – Writ Petition under Article 226 – Challenge to Rejection of Deemed Conveyance – Developer’s Delay in Redevelopment Not a Justification – Statutory Rights under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 Upheld – Competent Authority Directed to Issue Conveyance Certificate

18 Feb 2025

Constitution of India, Article 226 – Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management, and Transfer) Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Remand Order in Gram Panchayat Dispute — Holds That Appellate Authority Must Decide Appeal on Merits Without Remanding to Collector. The Court set aside the Additional Divisional Commissioner's order remanding the matter to the Collector and directed the appellate authority to decide the appeal on merits under Section 26 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

1 Nov 2023

The petitioners, residents and voters of village Haldi, Taluka-Karveer, District-Kolhapur, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Ex-Parte Injunction in Development Agreement Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Specific Performance as Agreement Was Only a Draft. The court held that a draft agreement shared for suggestions does not constitute a concluded contract, and the balance of convenience favored the defendant-owner under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC.

20 Mar 2023

The applicant, Jatin Jitendra Rasiklal Shah, was the original defendant No.1 and owner of Nazul Plot No. 2/1 in Amravati. The respondent No.1, Shardul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeal in Housing Board Dispute — Unauthorized Construction Not Ipso Facto Nuisance but Concurrent Findings Upheld. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Despite Section 71 Bar of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 as Suit Pertains to Private Rights.

11 Dec 2019

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendant No.1, Sau. Smita Mohod, against concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the Trial Court...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned construction; Court held that retention of premium without utilization is unjust enrichment and directed refund with interest.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

77 78 79 80 81

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)