Search Results for "Financial Facilities"

1376 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1376 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition in Dishonour of Cheque Case — Sets Aside Return of Complaint on Jurisdictional Grounds. Presentation of Cheque for Collection and Issuance of Statutory Notice at Mumbai Confer Jurisdiction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, HDFC Bank Ltd. (formerly Centurion Bank of Punjab Ltd.), filed three criminal complaints under Section 138 read with Section 141 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Discharge in Bank Fraud Case — Petitioner, a General Manager of a Cooperative Bank, Allegedly Violated RBI Guidelines by Investing in Non-SLR Securities Through a Broker, Causing Loss to the Bank.

The petitioner, Kishore Deshpande, was the General Manager of CKP Co-operative Bank Ltd. and was arraigned as accused No.5 in FIR No. RC 8/E/2010 regi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Cheque Was Issued as Security, Not for Repayment of Loan.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Vyomesh Jitendra Trivedi, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

(1) WRIT PETITION NO.4168 OF 2012

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Structure Under MRTP Act — Petitioner Failed to Produce Valid Documents to Establish Legality of Construction.

The petitioner, Jitendra Gorakh Megh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the demolition of his bungalow ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Enforcement of Consent Terms Against Non-Signatory Defendant in Debenture Dispute. Interpretation of Consent Decree Held That Clause 11(a) Obligation to Pay Was Only on Defendant No.5, Not Defendant No.6, Who Was Not a Party to the Consent Terms.

The case involves two appeals filed by the original Defendant No.5 (Dewanchand Ramsaran Trading Pvt. Ltd. and others) against a common order of the le...