Search Results for "share dealing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "share dealing"

2120 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2120 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Case — Rejects Trial Court's Finding of No Prima Facie Case. Court holds that the trial court erred in rejecting an application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC by misreading the plaint and ignoring the plaintiff's possession and title documents.

12 Jan 2024

The appellant, Nasir Khan, filed a miscellaneous first appeal under Section 104 read with Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance with Exemplary Costs for Suppression of Facts and Forum Shopping. Plaintiffs failed to disclose prior pending suit and obtained ex parte orders by misrepresentation, leading to dismissal and costs of Rs. 5 lakhs.

5 Mar 2018

The plaintiffs, Anand Agarwal and Pramila Anand Agarwal, filed a Commercial Suit No. 614 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court seeking specific perform...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Testamentary Case — Disqualification Under Section 25 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 for Murder of Husband. Conviction for murder of husband disqualifies widow from inheriting his estate as 'murderer' under Section 25 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

17 Dec 2018

The case involves an appeal against an order of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing a Chamber Summons filed by the Appellant,...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeals in APMC License Cancellation Case — No Interference with Concurrent Findings of Fact. The court upheld the Single Judge's dismissal of writ petitions challenging license cancellation by the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, finding no perversity or error of law.

14 May 2018

The case involves two intra-Court appeals (W.A. Nos. 6870/2017 and 6871/2017) filed by Sri Chitturi Durga Rao and Nirmala Bagodi respectively, against...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in APMC License Cancellation Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Refusing to Interfere with Cancellation of License for Non-Compliance with Bye-Laws. Licensee Failed to Establish Valid License and Was Not Entitled to Relief Under Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966.

14 May 2018

The case involves two intra-Court appeals filed by Sri Chitturi Durga Rao and Nirmala Bagodi against a common order dated 13.12.2017 passed by a learn...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Trial Court Judgment for Lack of Reasons in Declaration and Injunction Suit — Remands for Fresh Disposal. Court finds that the Trial Court failed to discuss evidence or assign reasons on issues framed, rendering the judgment unsustainable under Order 20 Rule 4(2) CPC.

18 Dec 2015

The appellant, who was the defendant in the original suit, challenged the judgment and decree dated 23 June 2014 passed by the XLIII Additional City C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Violation of Status Quo Order in Arbitration Dispute. Status Quo Order Ambiguous and Not Willfully Disobeyed by Respondents in Sale of Flats Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Jul 2026

The judgment arises from a contempt petition filed by Amkhim Holdings Pvt. Ltd. and Vasant Kotak & Bros. Trading & Investments Pvt. Ltd. against respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award Confirming Sale of Partnership Assets. Concurrent findings of fact by arbitrator and District Judge under Section 34 are not perverse and not liable to be interfered with in appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Jul 2026

The appellant, Mr. Abdulgapr Maktumsab Hudali, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgmen...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Kolhapur Dismisses Appellant's Arbitration Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award and District Judge's Order Confirming Payment of Balance Consideration Under MoU. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Execution of MoU and Payment of Consideration Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34.

20 Jul 2026

The Appellant, Mr. Abdulgapr Maktumsab Hudali, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the Judgmen...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Kolhapur Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award and District Judge's Order Dismissing Section 34 Application. The court held that the challenge to the arbitral award on merits is not permissible under Section 34 as the award is not patently illegal or against public policy.

20 Jul 2026

The appellant, Mr. Abdulgapr Maktumsab Hudali, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgmen...

76 77 78 79 80

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)