Search Results for "res judicata not made out"

943 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 943 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows DNA Test to Determine Paternity in Civil Suit for Declaration of Status. Court holds that DNA test is necessary to ascertain truth and does not violate right to privacy when ordered in a civil proceeding for declaration of paternity.

The appellant, Chaturbhuj Pradhan (CP), was aggrieved by concurrent orders of the First Additional Civil Judge, Class-II, Basna and the High Court of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for FEMA Violations in Bogus Export Case — Appellant Director Held Liable for Receiving Remittances Without Actual Exports Under Sections 3(b) and 3(d) of FEMA.

The case involves an appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Rent Recovery Suit — Defendant Not Liable for Rent After Vacating Premises. Tenant's Liability for Rent Ceases Upon Vacating and Handing Over Possession, Even Without Formal Termination Notice Under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by the defendant, M. Bhaskar, against the judgment and decree dated 27.06.2015 passed by the VII Additi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Execution Order in Eviction Suit — Mundkar Claim Rejected, Adverse Possession Not Proven. The executing court erred in dismissing execution on the ground of adverse possession when the decree was valid and the issue was already decided.

The petitioners, Miss Aura Serafina Crispina de Souza and Miss Agnes Felicia de Souza, are the original decree-holders who obtained an eviction decree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession Against Trespassers for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 9A CPC. Court holds that the suit is not maintainable as the property is wakf property and the Wakf Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction under the Wakf Act, 1995.

The plaintiffs, Valimohamed Haji Allarakha Sonawala Wakf through its trustees and mutawallis, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a declarat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Decree-Holders' Appeals Against Executing Court's Interim Stay Order in Execution Proceedings. Held That Executing Court Cannot Stay Execution Beyond Order XXI Rule 29 CPC and Must Follow Procedure Under Order XXI Rule 37 CPC Before Arrest.

The case involves appeals by the decree-holders (appellants) against an interim order dated 29th June 2018 passed by the Principal Sub-Judge, Kottayam...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Charity Commissioner's Scheme in Trust Dispute. Court upholds exclusive jurisdiction of Charity Commissioner under Section 50 of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 to frame scheme for public trust.

The petitioners, who were trustees of a trust, filed writ petitions challenging the order of the Joint Charity Commissioner framing a scheme for the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Medical College Admission Process — Upholds Institutional Preference and Reservation Policy. Institutional preference by minority unaided medical colleges is permissible under Article 30(1) of the Constitution and does not violate Article 14.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by students challenging the admission process for MBBS/BDS courses in medical colleges in Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit, Confirms Concurrent Findings on Limitation and Valuation. Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963 applies to suit for possession based on title, and valuation under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 is not a jurisdictional issue.

The appellant, original defendant, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent judgments ...