Search Results for "prior consultation"

1203 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1203 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Allotment of Gairan Land for PMAY Housing Due to Violation of Section 22A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Collector's Order Set Aside for Failure to Establish Non-Availability of Alternative Land Before Diverting Common Pasture Land.

The petitioners, Santosh Madhukar Bhondve and others, filed a writ petition challenging the allotment of 1H 46R of land in Gut No.96, situated at Mauj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Incriminating Evidence. Court held that non-compliance with Section 52A of NDPS Act and absence of contraband recovery from accused Nos. 4, 5, and 6 entitled them to bail.

The Bombay High Court heard four bail applications arising from the same crime under the NDPS Act. The applicants were accused of involvement in a dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Criminal Complaint Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC. The court quashed the criminal complaint as an abuse of process, without deciding on the co-existence of wakf and trust or jurisdiction of Wakf Tribunal.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court rejecting a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, filed by the ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employee in Service Law Dispute Over Denial of Salary for Suspension Period. Appellate Authority's Order Treating Suspension Period as Dies Non After Setting Aside Removal Found Impermissible Under Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970.

The dispute involved an employee appointed as a Clerk in the State Transport Department in 1979, who faced criminal cases leading to suspension and re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Tariff Dispute Over Change in Law Due to Wildlife Notification. Held that the notification declaring buffer zone around Tadoba Tiger Reserve constituted a 'Change in Law' under PPAs, entitling APML to compensatory tariff for all four PPAs.

The present appeals arise from a dispute between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the appellant, and Adani Power M...