Search Results for "misconceived"

2539 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2539 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application, Holds LLP Can Be Party to Arbitration Under LLP Agreement Despite Not Being Signatory. LLP Agreement is Charter Document Binding the LLP, and Disputes Relating to LLP's Affairs Necessarily Involve LLP as Party.

The applicant, Kartik Radia, a former partner of BDO India LLP, was expelled from the LLP. He sought to initiate arbitration under the LLP Agreement d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Discharge in PMLA Case — Money Laundering Held to be Continuing Offence. Retrospective Application of PMLA Upheld Where Proceeds of Crime Remain in Circulation, Irrespective of When Scheduled Offence Was Committed.

The appellant, Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma, was implicated in a money laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) based ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismissed Appeal Seeking Preliminary Inquiry Before FIR Registration. Preliminary Inquiry Not Mandatory for Cognizable Offences — Successive FIRs Do Not Automatically Amount to Harassment — Legal Safeguards Available Against Malicious Prosecution

Registration of FIR is a statutory duty when a cognizable offence is disclosed. The absence of a preliminary inquiry does not vitiate FIRs unless prov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies SEBI's Jurisdiction in Investor Compensation Claims Under Securities Law. SEBI Lacks Power to Award Direct Compensation but Can Order Disgorgement of Ill-Gotten Gains for Restitution Under Sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

The dispute originated in 2005 when the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a show-cause notice to M/s. Vital Communications Limited ...