Search Results for "blood group evidence"

1235 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1235 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part, Converts Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Property Dispute Assault. Single Axe Blow on Head Without Premeditation or Intention to Kill Reduces Offence from Section 302 IPC to Part I of Section 304 IPC.

The case arises from a property dispute between two brothers, Ramesh (appellant no.1) and Gajanan (deceased), who lived adjacent to each other. On 9 J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Appeals by Convicts in Group Assault and Murder Case; Key Eyewitness Accounts Found Suffering from Material Omissions. Evidence of Recovery of Weapons and Common Object Under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149 Re-evaluated.

These four criminal appeals arose from a common judgment and order dated 14 June 2006 passed by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rakesh @ Bhaiya Shambhuprasad Gupta, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, in Sessions Case No.206 of 2012 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant's Conviction for Killing His Wife Confirmed as Circumstantial Evidence, Including Motive and Last Seen Together, Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Madhukar Ganpat Nigade, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 902 of 1994 for the murder of his wif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Conduct. Conviction under Sections 366, 376(2)(f), 376(2)(n) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Conduct Inconsistent with Forcible Intercourse.

The appellant, Shailesh Mahadeo Lanjewar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur for offences under Sections 366, 376(2)(f) and 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Over Land Dispute — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient. Brothers convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for killing neighbour; court finds motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anandrao Bapuso Patil and Vilas @ Balaso Bapuso Patil, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of Bhanudas under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of the appellants (accused nos. 1 and 5 in some appeals, and accused no. 2 in another) by the Fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Fifteen Accused Against Conviction for Murder, Attempt to Murder and Rioting Armed with Deadly Weapons. Trial Court Convictions Under Sections 302, 307, 324, 147, 148, 149, 323, 504 IPC and Fine Imposed, While Acquittal Under Bombay Police Act Maintained.

The case arose from a family dispute over ill-treatment of the complainant's sister by her husband's family. On 20 November 2003, the complainant's si...