Search Results for "additional material"

14466 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14466 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petitions Challenging Departmental Enquiry Initiation Against Judicial Officer for Breach of CJI Guidelines. Court Examines Whether Enquiry Requires Written Complaint Supported by Affidavit Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1979.

The matter arose from two writ petitions filed by a Civil Judge Junior Division challenging orders dated 15-07-2016 by which the Registrar General of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Challenge to Reopening of Assessment under Section 148 of Income Tax Act. Assessee Contends Full Disclosure and Argues Against Grounds of Under-assessment, While Revenue Defends Notice Based on Tangible Material and Absence of Previous Query.

The case involved a writ petition filed by the Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. challenging a notice dated 24 March 2011 issued by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Multiple Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Convictions under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the accused.

The case involves multiple appeals against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, convicting several accused for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Right to Representation. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Infringed Due to Non-Supply of Grounds in Understandable Language and Unexplained Delay.

The Bombay High Court allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Notification Declaring PFI Unlawful with Immediate Effect under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Court Holds That Reasons for Immediate Effect are Sufficiently Disclosed in Notification Itself as Required by Section 3(3) Proviso.

The petitioner, claiming to be the President of Popular Front of India (PFI), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the H...