Search Results for "Special Bench decision"

10422 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10422 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Seniority List in High Court Staff Service. Court upholds the principle that seniority is determined by the date of continuous officiation in a cadre, not by the date of initial appointment or confirmation.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by employees of the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the seniority list of Assistant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Migrant Employee's Claim for Caste Status Recognition in Service Matter. Caste Certificate from State of Origin Held Valid for Union Territory Employment Under Articles 14, 16, and 341 of Constitution.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions: one filed by V.N. Kotiya, a Junior Engineer in the Electricity Department of Daman and Diu, and another by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 1562 2004 AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO.

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Public Interest Litigation on Encroachments on Public Utility Land in Nagpur. Petition Treated as PIL and Notice Issued to Authorities for Removal of Encroachments on Reserved Lands.

The matter involves a public interest litigation filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, by social workers Madhukar Sampatr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Recovery of Time-Barred Debts under the Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979: Resolving Legal Ambiguities and Clarifying Recovery Mechanisms Navigating the Intersection of Statutes of Limitation and Debt Recovery in India

Recovery of Time-Barred Debts under the Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979: Appeals arising from judgments of the High Court of Punja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to COFEPOSA Preventive Detention Powers for Foreign Exchange Violations. Petitioners Contend Absence of Penal Provisions Under FEMA Renders Section 3(1) Unconstitutional.

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed directly in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...