Search Results for "Majority rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Majority rule"

2407 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2407 result(s)

High Court

Writ petition challenges the Industrial Court's declaration that the Municipal Corporation committed unfair labour practice by denying ex-gratia payment to striking workers. The dispute involves interpretation of items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, regarding discriminatory denial of a long-standing annual festival payment.

8 Aug 2012

Petitioner No. 1, the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, a statutory authority under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, employs over 14...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Case — Interim Stay on Nomination of Non-Functional Director. Court Examines Interpretation of Section 397 of Companies Act, 1956 Regarding Automatic Winding Up upon Establishing Oppression and Power to Mould Relief.

16 Jun 2025

The judgment under consideration arises from two company appeals filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 before the Bombay High Court, chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC; Considers Whether Prosecutrix's Testimony and Medical Evidence Support Conviction. Prosecution's case hinged on testimony of prosecutrix who allegedly eloped voluntarily, raising questions on the legality of conviction under Section 366 IPC when the girl was on the verge of attaining majority.

28 Feb 2011

The present criminal appeal arose from the judgment of the Extra Joint Sessions Judge, Latur in Sessions Case No. 132 of 1998, wherein the appellant w...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay: Outcome Not Mentioned in Writ Petition Challenging Regulation of Purse Seine Fishing. The Court examined the constitutional validity of the February 5, 2016 order under section 4(1) of the Maharashtra Marine Fishing Regulation Act, 1981 and its compliance with Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 21.

20 Oct 2021

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by five petitioners representing 222 persons engaged in purse seine fishing...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by BBMP Employees' Association Challenging Recruitment Rule 4(a) — Rule Providing 50% Direct Recruitment and 50% Promotion Held Valid. The court held that Rule 4(a) of the BBMP (General Cadre and Recruitment of Officers and Employees) Rules, 2018 is not ultra vires the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 and is within the rule-making power under Section 421 of the Act.

26 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Officer and Employees Welfare Association, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allots Special Civil Application Challenging Baroda Cricket Association Election Candidates' Eligibility. Court Grants Ad-Interim Relief Permitting Voting but Restrains Counting of Votes Pending Final Disposal of Petition.

16 Mar 2026

The present matter before the Gujarat High Court concerned a challenge to the candidature of four individuals for the posts of President, Secretary, a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Domicile-Based Priority in MBBS Admissions — First Priority Rule Requiring Study from VIII to XII in Union Territory Upheld as Reasonable Classification. Rule 4(a) of Admission Prospectus for NAMO Medical College, Silvassa, held valid and not violative of Article 14 of Constitution.

17 Dec 2020

The petitioner, a domicile of Dadra & Nagar Haveli, appeared for NEET-2020 and secured 502 marks. She applied for MBBS admission at NAMO Medical Educa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

10 Aug 2022

The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...

76 77 78 79 80

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)