Search Results for "Compensation Officer"

4829 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4829 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — No Negligence on Part of Deceased Driver. Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as Tribunal Correctly Applied Structured Formula Without Need to Prove Negligence.

The appeal was filed by the insurance company, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, challenging the judgment and award dated 09.05.2014 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Death After 18 Months — Tribunal's Denial of Future Loss of Income Set Aside. Causal Connection Between Accident and Death Established Through Medical Evidence Despite Absence of Post-Mortem Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Pravin Pawar, sustained injuries on 03.03.2016 when a tractor reversed and dashed him ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Reduces Contributory Negligence from 20% to 10% in Motor Accident Claim — Appellant Motorcyclist Injured in Head-On Collision with Jeep. Court Held That Absence of Evidence of Negligence on Part of Claimant Warrants Reduction of Contributory Negligence and Enhancement of Compensation.

The appellant, Lahernath Raghunath Gauswami, was the original claimant in a motor accident claim petition. On 02.03.2006, while returning to his villa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced for Land and Fruit Trees. Land's Potentiality and Income from Trees Considered for Fair Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Shriram s/o Namdeo Hoge, owned land Gut No.4, measuring 4 hectares, in Dahigaon, Taluka Chikhali, District Buldhana. The land was acqui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. Court holds that arbitrator erred in rejecting claim for interest on delayed payment of compensation and in not awarding solatium under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, Kekobad Dossabhoy Doongriwalla and Khorshed Navzar Wadia, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — Dispute Over Property Inheritance and Mutation Entry Cannot Be Decided in Writ Jurisdiction; Remedy Lies Before Civil Court.

The petitioners, five individuals claiming to be co-owners of certain agricultural lands in Ranewadi, Kasal, Taluka-Kudal, District Sindhudurg, filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Driver in Employee's Compensation Case — Remands for Fresh Consideration on Merits. Commissioner's Dismissal for Default Set Aside as Claimant's Medical Evidence and Inability to Attend Were Not Properly Considered Under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923.

The appellant, Sandeep B.N., was a driver employed by the second respondent, B.N. Santhosh, driving a maxi cab bearing registration No.KA-03-D-5331. H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Businessman in Motor Accident — Negligence of Driver Established, No Contributory Negligence. Claimant Awarded Rs.10,00,600/- with 9% Interest Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, R.N. Manjula, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Application of Section 157 Amendment in Land Reforms Dispute. Simultaneous Amendment of Section 157(1)(a) Read with Section 21(h) of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951, Given Retrospective Effect to Avoid Frustrating Legislative Intent.

The dispute pertained to the status of Sukhram Singh and Laiq Singh as Adhivasis or Asamis under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 19...