Search Results for "pay and recovery"

6683 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6683 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302 and 324 IPC set aside as prosecution witnesses turned hostile and medical evidence did not corroborate the alleged assault.

The appellant, Sri Muniraju, was convicted by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kolar (sitting at KGF) in Sessions Case No.147/2016 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction in Bribery Case. Appeal Challenges Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act for Accepting ₹1,000 Bribe for Caste Verification Certificate.

The case arose from a complaint filed by Kiran Kumar, a temporary driver with BMTC, who alleged that T. Siddaiah, a First Division Assistant in the Ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Dismisses Criminal Appeal of Accused in Murder Case, Upholding Life Imprisonment Under Section 302 IPC. Conviction Based on Sole Eyewitness Testimony of Deceased’s Mother Upheld as Credible Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Recovery of Weapon.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Vikas @ Sadhu Gendev Hagare, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, for murder under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Money Recovery Instead of Specific Performance. The High Court erred in granting specific performance as the transaction was found to be a loan with collateral security under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the subsequent purchasers (appellants) against the High Court's decree granting specific performance of an agr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of DRAT Orders on Pre-Deposit Waiver and Status Quo in Secured Asset Auction. Legal Question Concerns Applicability of Section 18 Pre-Deposit Requirement to Appeals Dismissing Condonation of Delay and Challenging Sale Certificate.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by an auction purchaser (Aloukik Construwell LLP) and a secured creditor (HDFC Bank Limited) challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...