Search Results for "negative response"

1020 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1020 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Visually Impaired Peon Against Termination Due to 100% Disability. Holds That 40% Minimum Disability Requirement Under Advertisement Cannot Override Statutory Provisions of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995.

The petitioner, Patel Suleman Gaibi, who is 100% visually disabled, applied for the post of peon in the Irrigation Department of the State of Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case on Interest Liability for Provisional Assessment. Section 11DD of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable to differential duty determined on finalization of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

The appellant, Godrej Industries Limited, was engaged in the manufacture of Liquid Hair Dye during the period from September 1982 to March 1985. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Courts Below Correctly Appreciated Evidence on Title and Possession.

The case is a second appeal arising from a suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the original plaintiff Bajirao Amrit Shinde (since deceased,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Atrocities Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Requirement. Alleged Offensive Language Not Uttered in Public View, Essential Ingredient Under Section 3(1)(ix) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Missing.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Dr. Rahul Dharmaraj Khade, a Sub Divisional Police Officer in Gadchiroli, challenging the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against HR Managers in Workplace Harassment Case — Allegations of Outraging Modesty Under Sections 354, 509 IPC Not Made Out. Court Held That Absence of Sexual Overtone or Physical Contact Renders FIR Unsubstantiated, Abuse of Process of Law.

The petitioners, six individuals employed as HR managers and executives in a private company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Documents. Nephew of detenu successfully challenged preventive detention order under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA on grounds of procedural irregularities and lack of material evidence.

The petitioner, nephew of the detenu Salma Karolia, challenged a detention order dated 30th September 2014 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservati...