Search Results for "ascertained liability"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "ascertained liability"

844 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 844 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Appellants' Application Under Order 21 Rules 97, 98, 101 CPC Rejected by Executing Court Set Aside. Court Holds That Executing Court Must Determine Rights of Third Parties Claiming Independent Possession Under Order 21 Rule 101 CPC Before Confirming Sale.

19 Sep 2022

The present appeal was filed by the appellants, who were the legal heirs of the original judgment-debtor, Hiranappa (since deceased), and other family...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Sections 118 and 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

11 Jun 2021

The present criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner, Sri R. Rajappa, challenging the judgment of conviction and order on senten...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Stamp Duty Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record in Order Granting Time to Pay Deficit Stamp Duty. Review Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Ground Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC for Recall of Judgment.

14 Sep 2021

The Review Petition No.340 of 2019 was filed by Seetharama Shetty (the petitioner/plaintiff) seeking recall of the judgment dated 23.08.2019 passed in...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act for Delay in Filing Section 34 Application — Limitation Period for Challenging Arbitral Award Cannot Be Extended Beyond Statutory Cap. The court held that the appellant's application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was barred by limitation as it was filed over four years after the award, far beyond the three-month period plus thirty-day extension allowed under Section 34(3).

19 Feb 2026

The appellant, Darshana Bhupendra Parekh, filed a First Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the dismissal of...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Enhances Compensation for Injured Pedestrian in Motor Accident Case, Reduces Contributory Negligence from 50% to 25%. The court held that the driver of the truck was primarily negligent and the claimant's 70% permanent partial disability warranted full loss of future prospects under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

27 Mar 2026

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the original claimant, Prabodhakumar Behera, a pedestrian, was hit by a truck on 22.12.1996, resulti...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Enhances Compensation by Setting Aside Contributory Negligence and Including Agricultural Income. The court held that without evidence of contributory negligence and where the driver fails to appear, adverse inference must be drawn against the driver, and agricultural income from land records must be considered under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

9 Mar 2026

The appellant, Keshavbhai Kurjibhai Vora, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Classification Dispute. Services Provided by Respondent to Overseas Manufacturers Held Not Classifiable as Business Auxiliary Services and Treated as Export of Services.

31 Jul 2017

The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai, appealed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against an order dated 07-01-2015 passed by the Cu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Case — Repairs/Reconstruction Contracts Covered Under 'Construction Contracts' for Tax Rate Purposes. The Court held that the term 'construction contracts' in Section 42(3) of the MVAT Act read with Notification dated 30 November 2006 includes repairs/reconstruction of buildings, and the rate of tax is 5%.

25 Jul 2017

The appellant, Painterior (India), a registered partnership firm under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act), is engaged in the busines...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Onerous Bail Conditions in Commercial Dispute Case — Directs Defreezing of Bank Account. Court held that imposing condition of depositing Rs.59 crore for bail in a case arising from a commercial transaction is unreasonable and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2017

The petitioners, Vyomesh Shah, Kiran Contractor, and Suhass Dumbre, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes DV Act Proceedings Against Married Sister and Brother-in-Law. Married Sister Not a 'Respondent' Under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 as She Does Not Share a Domestic Relationship or Shared Household with the Aggrieved Wife.

20 Dec 2017

The applicants, including the husband, his parents, his married sister, and her husband, challenged proceedings initiated by the wife (respondent no.1...

75 76 77 78 79

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)