Search Results for "Void Order"

5143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Determines Factual Enquiry Whether Share Transfer Resulted in Members Exceeding Fifty. Enquiry Directed by Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014 Following Dispute Over Validity of Pre-emption Rights in Articles of Association.

The appeal was placed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay following a remand order by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Grant of Temporary Injunction Restraining a Society from Interfering with Duties of its Associate Secretary. The dispute involved the validity of a suspension order issued by a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960.

The dispute originated from a suspension order dated 25.04.2023 issued by the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA), a society registered under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Claim for Damages in Wild Life Sanctuary Case — No Right to Compensation Without Acquisition. Notification Under Section 18 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Right to Damages for Loss of Use.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Natesan Agencies (Plantations), a partnership firm, against the judgment of the Madras High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010521472015_1

The plaintiff, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in developing resorts and health clubs, entered into an agreement to purcha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Daughter's Appeal Against Dismissal of Petition Challenging Father's Marriage Under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC. Family Court Erred in Holding That Earlier Suit for Declaration of Marriage as Void Was Barred by Res Judicata as Cause of Action Was Different.

The appellant, Mrs. Nayana M. Ramani, is the married daughter of late Mr. Navnitlal R. Shah. The respondent, Mrs. Fizzah Navnitlal Shah, claims to hav...