Search Results for "Separate assessment"

2052 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2052 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Cross-Objection and Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved, No Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.1,80,000/- to Rs.3,34,000/- with 6% Interest.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of a deceased 20-year-old man who died in a road accident on 23-07-2007. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in KVAT Act Case — Remands Matter to Tribunal for Fresh Consideration on Input Tax Credit Disallowance. The court held that the Tribunal must decide appeals on merits and cannot dismiss them without examining the grounds raised by the assessee.

The petitioner, M/s. Manasa Electricals Co., is a trader in electrical goods. For the assessment year 2005-06, the petitioner filed KVAT returns in Fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of State Tax Officer Under IGST; Confiscation of Arecanut Goods Upheld. Court Holds that Section 4 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Does Not Require Separate Notification for Cross-Empowerment of State Officers.

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern dealing in arecanut, challenged a series of orders passed by the Commercial Tax Officer (Enforcement) under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction in GST Confiscation Case. Commercial Tax Officer Holds Proper Officer Status Under IGST Act Due to Cross Empowerment; Notification Only Required for Exceptions.

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern engaged in trading arecanut, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...