Search Results for "Maharashtra 2015 Act"

7186 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7186 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank Officials and BGR Energy Executives in Bank Guarantee Dispute -- No Criminal Intent Found in Commercial Transaction Under IPC Sections 420, 403, 406, 418, 425, 427 read with 34

The High Court quashed an FIR registered against bank officials and company executives alleging criminal offences in connection with bank guarantee tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeals Against Acquittal and Conviction in Wife's Burn Death Case. The Appeals Arise from Trial Court Verdict Convicting Husband for Murder Under Section 302 IPC While Acquitting Him and In-Laws of Dowry Harassment.

Background: This matter involves three criminal appeals before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, arising from the judgment of the Additional Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age — Benefit of Doubt Given as Prosecution Failed to Establish Minority of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 4, 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 363, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Ashik Ramjan Ansari, was convicted by the Special Judge at Greater Bombay in POCSO Special Case No.203 of 2016 for offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay. Preventive detention under Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 set aside as live nexus between smuggling activity and detention order snapped by 10-month delay.

The petitioner, Farida Imram Chamundi, wife of the detenu, challenged a preventive detention order passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Consent Order in Company Oppression Case — Parties Bound by Consensus. Consent order for share buyout under Sections 397-398 of Companies Act, 1956 cannot be challenged by consenting party.

The case involves an appeal filed by Shalby Limited and others against an order dated 25.04.2016 passed by the Company Law Board (CLB), New Delhi Benc...