Search Results for "Arbitration award execution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Arbitration award execution"

1102 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1102 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award in False Ceiling Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award on Certain Claims but Sets Aside Award on Claim for Price Escalation Due to Lack of Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms.

13 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), challenged an arbitral award dated 29 March 2011 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Liquidated Damages and Interest Reduced. Court upholds arbitrator's finding on delay but modifies interest rate from 7% to 6% per annum under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 May 2011

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Indian Oil Corporation Limited (petitioner) against a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Arbitration and Execution Proceedings to Principal District Judge Nagpur by Consent. Parties Agree Not to Raise Objections Under Arbitration Act or Commercial Courts Ordinance, 2015.

1 Aug 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Kandla Cargo Handlers, challenged an order dated 27.6.2018 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Nagpur, which granted ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to discharge burden of proving the agreement and that the defendant's possession was permissive, leading to dismissal of the suit.

10 Sep 2015

The appellants (defendants) challenged the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2015 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Nelamangala, in O.S. No. 82/2010, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Invocation of Performance Guarantee in Arbitration Dispute — Finds Prima Facie Case of Fraud and Irretrievable Injustice. Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked to protect petitioner's interests pending arbitration.

9 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T), filed an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Land Acquisition Dispute — Compensation Enhancement Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence. Court holds that the Arbitral Tribunal cannot award compensation beyond the Reference Court's award without proper evidence under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two cross-petitions arising out of an arbitral award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, concerning compensation for l...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Criminal Petition Under Section 482 CrPC — Allegations of Mischief, Criminal Intimidation, and Cheatment Found to Be Civil Dispute. Court Held That Where Dispute Is Purely Civil in Nature, Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Sustained and Are an Abuse of Process of Law.

9 Apr 2021

The petitioners, Mrs. G. Chitra Poornima and Mr. Jagadish, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Appellate Award Allowing Claims for Debit Balance. Client Failed to Prove Unauthorized Trades or Misappropriation of Shares; Burden of Proof Not Discharged Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Shankarlal V. Keswani, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Impleadment Order Under Section 37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act — Impleadment Not an Interlocutory Order Under Section 17. The court held that an order allowing impleadment of parties in arbitration proceedings is not appealable under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as it does not constitute an order under Section 17 of the Act.

10 Apr 2026

The petition was filed under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an order of the learned arbitral tribunal date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal from Injunction Order Granting Interim Relief in IPL Franchise Termination Dispute. Division Bench Considers Whether Change in Shareholding Pattern Constituted Irremediable Breach Warranting Termination of Franchise Agreement Under Clauses 10 and 11, and Whether Conditions Imposed by Single Judge Were Sufficient Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Dec 2010

Background: The dispute pertained to the termination of a franchise agreement between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and KPH Dream C...

75 76 77 78 79

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)