Search Results for "special land acquisition officer"

2054 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2054 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Double Acquisition of Land in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Proceedings Quashed as Land Already Acquired Once and Partitioned Thereafter. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 4(1) — Double acquisition of same land not permissible.

The petitioners, Devram Govind Gadge and Vitthal Govind Gadge, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition proceedings initiated by the Special ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons. Notification under Section 4 and Declaration under Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 upheld as acquisition was for public purpose of resettlement of displaced persons.

The petitioners, heirs of Ramchandra Desai @ Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the Notificati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Reference by Land Acquisition Officer in Apportionment Dispute Under Section 30 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Claimant No. 1 Held Entitled to Entire Compensation as Owner of Acquired Land.

The Land Acquisition Officer filed a reference under section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, seeking determination of apportionment of compensat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Cases. Reference Court's enhancement of compensation based on sale instances and potential value of acquired land upheld as appellant failed to produce evidence to rebut the claim.

The appellant, Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, was the acquiring body for land acquisition for a minor irrigation project. The respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation to Rs.1,00,000 per Hectare. Reference Court's failure to consider potential for development and higher potential value leads to inadequate compensation under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the claimants (legal heirs of Bakshi Kanhu Rathod) against the judgment and order dated 18.3.1996 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows in Part Appeals by Claimants and State in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. Market Value of Agricultural Land Determined at Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with Interest on Enhanced Compensation.

The case involves four appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The State of Maharashtra acquired agric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reduces Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Comparability of Sale Deeds and Awards. Reference Court Erred in Relying on Ex.P-41 Without Examining Whether Lands Were Comparable.

The case involves an appeal by the Bijapur Urban Development Authority (BUDA) and a cross-objection by the claimants (landowners) against the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Court enhances compensation from Rs. 50 to Rs. 100 per sq. mtr. for land acquired for Government Boys' Hostel, considering non-agricultural use and sale instances.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment and award dated 25.04.2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division at Hingoli i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 40,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare. Irrigated Land with Development Potential Justifies Higher Market Value Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Fatimabegum, owned agricultural land in Gondwakadi, Yavatmal, comprising Gat No.79 (4.64 hectares) and Gat No.53 (4.46 hectares). The l...