Search Results for "motive not proved"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "motive not proved"

2996 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2996 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Five Appellants for Murder in MCOC Case — Common Intention Established by Unlawful Assembly and Recovery of Weapons. The court affirmed the trial court's finding that the appellants were part of an unlawful assembly that caused the death of the victim, and the conviction under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148 read with Section 149 IPC was sustained.

30 Aug 2019

The case involves five appellants who were convicted by the Special Judge under MCOC Act for the murder of a person. The prosecution case was that on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 498-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

22 Sep 2022

The appellant, Santosh Balu Mali, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of his wife Suman, under Sections 302, 201, and 498-A of the Indian ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Unnatural Offence of Minor Neighbour — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence. The court held that the child witness's evidence was reliable despite minor inconsistencies, and the prompt complaint and medical report supported the prosecution case.

9 Feb 2010

The appellant, Kailash Laxman Khamkar, was convicted by the Third Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for offences under Sections 366-A, 376 and 377 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Vitiated Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 found to be without application of mind, and prosecution evidence on demand and acceptance of bribe was mutually inconsistent.

29 May 2019

The appellant, Ravindra s/o Marotrao Thakre, was convicted by the Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for offences under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Husband and Relative in Dowry Harassment and Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Chain of Circumstantial Evidence Not Established, Failure to Prove Last Seen Together and Inconsistencies in Dowry Demand Led to Benefit of Doubt.

27 Jun 2017

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad dismissed an appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra against the acquittal of two accused in a dowry harassment a...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.4872 OF 2006

25 Sep 2006

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Accused in Murder Case, Restoring Acquittal Due to Unjustified Interference by High Court. High Court's Reversal of Acquittal Under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC Set Aside as Trial Court's View Was Plausible and Not Perse Under Principles of Section 378 Cr.P.C.

6 May 2021

The dispute arose from a criminal appeal before the Supreme Court of India, where the appellant, an accused in a murder case, challenged the High Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Wife Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as circumstances did not form complete chain pointing to guilt.

20 Nov 2019

The appellant, Ganpat Shetye, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, for the murder of his wife Sneha under Section 302 IPC and sente...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was declared hostile and no independent corroboration of demand and acceptance of bribe.

23 Feb 2024

The appellant, Shrikant Chimaji Jahagirdar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Solapur for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom in Panchkula Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Circumstantial evidence including call detail records and IMEI numbers sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 364A, 392, 120B IPC.

9 Jul 2024

The appellants were convicted by the trial court for kidnapping a boy, Sachin Garg, for ransom, robbery, and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Pena...

74 75 76 77 78

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)