Search Results for "management dispute"

4760 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4760 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Arbitration Award in Property Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Article 227. Court upholds concurrent findings of fact by arbitrator and appellate tribunal regarding validity of agreements and possession.

The judgment arises from three writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an arbitral award and the appellate ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicated Three Writ Petitions Involving Ownership and Compensation for Land at Village Ulwe. The Petitions Raised Issues Under the Inam Abolition Act, Land Acquisition Act, and the Indian Forest Act Regarding Vesting, Compensation, and Restoration of Possession.

The dispute arose from three writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court concerning land bearing Survey No. 51/0 at village Ulwe, Taluka Panvel,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Reinstatement and Backwages Due to Limitation Under Section 42(4) of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. Approach Notice Filed Beyond Stipulated Period Without Sufficient Cause, Hence Labour Court's Order Set Aside.

The petitioner, Pedru Mozes Fernandes, was a permanent workman employed as a boiler serviceman at Tata Mills from 1st March 1973. He worked continuous...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.

The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants to File Written Statement Beyond 120 Days in Pre-2015 Commercial Suit. Mandatory timeline under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to suits filed before the Act and transferred to Commercial Division.

The Bombay High Court addressed a preliminary legal question in a Notice of Motion arising from a Commercial Suit. The suit was originally filed in 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.1543 OF 2014

The matter arose from a stock trading dispute between Keynote Capitals Ltd. (a trading member of the National Stock Exchange) and Eco Recycling Ltd. (...