Search Results for "illegal recovery"

3321 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3321 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Rejection of Plaint Set Aside. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

The appellant, M/s. Shree Garodi Steels, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondent, M/s. Yojaka India Private Ltd., in O.S. No. 739...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Admission of Liability in Written Statement Constitutes Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963. Suit for Recovery of Money Based on Supply of Goods Held Not Time-Barred Due to Defendant's Admission.

The case involves a suit for recovery of money filed by M/s. Jindal Steels, a partnership firm (plaintiff), against Trident Architectural Aluminium Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Arms Act Violation in Land Dispute Shooting. Appellant-accused fired two rounds from a revolver at the deceased, causing death, and the court confirmed life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC and Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959.

The case arises from a land dispute that led to a fatal shooting. On 07.06.2012, the complainant and his son Nagjiji were at their agricultural field ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit for Willful Default and Subletting. Landlord's Bonafide Need for Business Expansion Upheld as Trial Court and Appellate Court Concurrent Findings Not Disturbed Under Article 227.

The petitioner, Sou. Bhamabai, wife of Ananda Raut, was defendant no.3 in a suit for eviction filed by the landlords (respondent nos.1 and 2) against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Interim Award on Limitation in Commercial Arbitration. Winding Up Proceedings Constitute Civil Proceedings for Exclusion of Time Under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The dispute arose from a purchase order dated 24 June 2013 placed by Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (petitioner) on Inspira IT Products Pvt. Ltd. (res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Homicide Alleged Under Sections 302, 201, 120B IPC.

The case pertains to the murder of Kiran Suryawanshi, who was married to accused No. 1 Monika. The prosecution alleged that Monika, along with accused...