Search Results for "exhaustive grounds"

1116 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1116 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging EPF Order Due to Non-Functional Appellate Tribunal. Alternate remedy under Section 7I of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 not a bar when tribunal is vacant.

The petitioner, HVPM's Degree College of Physical Education, Amravati, through its Secretary, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 42 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Tmt. Valarmathi, mother of the detenu Thiru Jayaprakash, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Between Arrest and Detention Order Was Snapped.

The petitioner, Sumathi, mother of the detenu Dhanushkumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Delay of Over Two Months Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid.

The petitioner, Aburojakani, mother of the detenu Mohammed Yusuf, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order held to snap live link, rendering detention invalid under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Pavithra R, the elder sister of the detenu Ajith Kumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 37 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Chinaponnu, grandmother of the detenu Vijay, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention. Delay of 38 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Matheshwari, mother of the detenu Jeganraj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the M...